January 3 - Caucus for Results - Locate your caucus

Iran

Dodd on the NIE

Matt Browner-Hamlin's picture

Chris Dodd today released the following statement in reaction to the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) report regarding Iran.

"The NIE on Iran contains some very important findings by the intelligence community. Taken together these findings make a strong case for pursuing robust diplomacy to resolve our differences with Iran and for an end to the reckless talk by the Administration and reckless votes by some members of Congress."

Dodd had previously sent a letter to President Bush calling for the prioritization of diplomacy with Iran, as well as stating his belief that the 2002 Authorization for the Use of Military Force with Iraq did not grant "license to deploy any military campaign against Iran."

Clear Leadership on Iran

Matt Browner-Hamlin's picture

Yesterday Senator Dodd signed a letter spearheaded by Senator Jim Webb to President Bush on Iran. He was joined by twenty-eight other Senators who agreed that the Kyl-Lieberman amendment on Iran "should in no way be interpreted as a predicate for the use of military force in Iran."

This letter is not the sum of Dodd's opposition to war with Iran -- nor does it preclude or substitute for any other legislative actions that can be taken to stop the march to war. Dodd is a cosponsor of Senate Resolution 356, which resolves "that any offensive military action taken against Iran must be explicitly approved by Congress before such action may be initiated."

Senator Dodd voted against Kyl-Lieberman, because he saw it as something that would pave the way to war with Iran. Dodd's vocal opposition to the march to war with Iran has been consistent and clear. In September Dodd personally sent a letter to President Bush:

“To date there has been a total absence of any serious U.S. diplomatic efforts to dissuade Iran from continuing its ill conceived and destabilizing policies. I am extremely concerned that your administration’s failure to employ robust diplomacy in dealing with the challenges posed by Iran could lead us down the same disastrous and ill-conceived path that has produced a failed policy in Iraq that has made us less secure.”

Senator Dodd has lead in the fight to silence the Bush administration's drumbeat for war. He will continue to do so at every opportunity. As Dodd said in September, “We shouldn’t repeat our mistakes and enable this President again.” That means we have to be consistent and clear in our opposition and we should expect our representatives in the Senate to consistently act to stop the march to war.

And that's just what Dodd has done, through his vote against Kyl-Lieberman, to individually calling on Bush to use diplomacy, to joining with a large majority of Democrats in the Senate to make clear to President Bush that he does not, to being a cosponsor to legislation now that will state clearly that military action with Iran requires Congressional authorization. You can count on him to continue leading with clarity on this critically important issue.

Update:

My colleague Hari Sevugan clearly explained the reasoning behind signing onto this letter even though Senator Dodd opposed Kyl-Lieberman:

Even though Dodd shares that view, he signed the letter because "we felt that it was necessary to make it clear that this administration cannot take military action against Iran without the express authorization of Congress," said Dodd spokesman Hari Sevugan.

MSNBC Debate: Dodd on Iran

Matt Browner-Hamlin's picture


Chris Dodd talks about Iran in last night's MSNBC debate.

Transcript below the fold (Click "read more").

If you say it enough, it must be true?

RHETORIC: Once again, Hillary Clinton is suggesting that her vote for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment was a vote for diplomacy. In fact, during tonight's Democratic debate in Philadelphia, Sen. Clinton used some variation of the word "diplomacy" eleven times in reference to Iran. [MSNBC, Democratic Primary Debate, 10/30/07, emphasis added]

REALITY: The number of times the Sense of the Senate section of Kyl-Lieberman actually mentions diplomacy: Zero. The final version of the Kyl-Lieberman amendment that Sen. Clinton supported did not call for the use of diplomacy. While the "findings" section of the amendment included quotes from Secretary of Defense Gates and Ambassador Crocker about the usefulness of diplomacy, it also quoted Ambassador Crocker discussing the failure of diplomacy with Iran. The main portion of the amendment that declared and defined Senate policy did not mention diplomacy at all. An earlier version of Kyl-Lieberman did contain this reference to support for diplomacy:

Section 4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies"

However, before the amendment was passed by the Senate this language was removed. [S Amdt 3017, CQ Vote 349, 9/26/07, emphasis added]

Meet the Press: Iran

Matt Browner-Hamlin's picture


Transcript below the fold...



 
Facebook Flickr MyGrito MySpace Twitter UStream.tv YouTube YouTube